A Comprehensive Review of the Novel Weighting Methods for Multi-Criteria Decision-Making

نویسندگان

چکیده

In the realm of multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) problems, selection a weighting method holds critical role. Researchers from diverse fields have consistently employed MCDM techniques, utilizing both traditional and novel methods to enhance discipline. Acknowledging significance staying abreast such methodological developments, this study endeavors contribute field through comprehensive review several weighting-based methods: CILOS, IDOCRIW, FUCOM, LBWA, SAPEVO-M, MEREC. Each is scrutinized in terms its characteristics steps while also drawing upon publications extracted Web Science (WoS) Scopus databases. Through bibliometric content analyses, delves into trend, research components (sources, authors, countries, affiliations), application areas, fuzzy implementations, hybrid studies (use other and/or ranking methods), tools for these methods. The findings offer an insightful portrayal applications each method, thereby contributing valuable knowledge researchers practitioners within MCDM.

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Simple Additive Weighting Methods of Multi criteria Decision Making and Applications: A Decade Review

Various multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) methods have been proposed to solve diverse applications of decision problems. One of the MCDM methods is additive weighting-based method. However, this method is not explicitly disseminated and its applications are not-well received by many MCDM enthusiasts. This paper presents a review of the applications of simple additive weighting (SAW) and fuz...

متن کامل

Using Multi Criteria Decision Making Methods for Evaluation the Entrepreneurship and Innovation Indicators

This paper offered a procedure for ranking the entrepreneurial and innovative indicators using Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM), taking into account three individual,organizational and cultural dimensions simultaneously in decision making procedure. Henceforward, by using the Meta synthesis framework, the form of group classification of indicators from afinding’s combination was suggested ...

متن کامل

Evaluation of recommender systems: A multi-criteria decision making approach

The evaluation and selection of recommender systems is a difficult decision making process. This difficulty is partially due to the large diversity of published evaluation criteria in addition to lack of standardized methods of evaluation. As such, a systematic methodology is needed that explicitly considers multiple, possibly conflicting metrics and assists decision makers to evaluate and find...

متن کامل

The place of AHP method among Multi Criteria Decision Making methods in forest management

As the name implies, Multi Criteria Decision Making Methods (MCDMs) is a decision making tool that capable the selection of the most preferred choice in a context where several criteria apply simultaneously.  Primary purpose of this study is to examine the status of Multi Criteria Decision Making Methods (MCDMs) in forest management. The study also aims to evaluate the strengths and weaknesses ...

متن کامل

INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY DIMENSIONAL ANALYSIS FOR MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING

Dimensional analysis, for multi-criteria decision making, is a mathematical method that includes diverse heterogeneous criteria into a single dimensionless index. Dimensional Analysis, in its current definition, presents the drawback to manipulate fuzzy information commonly presented in a multi-criteria decision making problem. To overcome such limitation, we propose two dimensional analysis ba...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Information

سال: 2023

ISSN: ['2078-2489']

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/info14050285